Bartleby the Scrivener

Bartleby the Scrivener Bartleby the Scrivener Bartleby the Scrivener is a short story that depicts the materialistic nature of the American society. The narrator of the story is a lawyer who has employed three scriveners and focuses on Bartleby, one of the scriveners. The main objective of this paper is to analyze the major character of Bartleby. When Bartleby is first employed as a scrivener, he emerges as a hardworking person whose work is above Turkey and Nipperss. He performs all the assignments given to him by the employer without questioning or refusing. As such, his employer describes him as, pallidly neat, pitiably respectable, and incurably forlorn (Melville, 2001). Such description sets Bartleby above the rest of the employees with whom the lawyer has had problems. However, as time goes by, Bartlebys character changes drastically. Moreover, he becomes indifference to the assignment of his employer. Notably, Bartleby displays rudeness through his refusal of the assignment from the employer through his characteristic answer, I would prefer not to whenever the employer makes any request to him (Burrack, 2007). Since Bartleby came up as an obedient employee when he was hired, his change of attitude to the point of refusing simple and common assignments brings him out as a mysterious person, especially to his employer. Additionally, Bartleby exhibits the character of a lone ranger shrouded in secrecy. He does not reveal whatever is ailing him to anyone, and even when the employer decides to change office, he is adamant to remain at the former office. The office is desolate and the only thing that one can see from inside is the brick wall that is several meters away. Still, this desolation does not make Bartleby leave the office. Even after his former employer offers to take him to the new office, he prefers to remain at the old one. In conclusion, Bartleby emerges as a passive person who is completely detached from the world. Moreover, this passivity makes him starve to death as he refuses to eat the food brought by his former employer.

Free Essays on emand for International Regimes

God-Like Man In Robert O. Keohane’s article, â€Å"Demand for International Regimes†, there are many strong point expressed by the author. The main argument for the article is that international regimes allow for a more efficient flow of world politics by cutting cost of agreements, making more and higher quality knowledge available to the actors in world politics, and lastly making a solid framework for the legal responsibility of agreement making. In the paper five main points are expressed. First is the identification of the strengths and weaknesses of constraint-choice analysis. Second is the function of regimes and the contexts within they operate. Third are the benefits of international regimes and the demand by the actors in world politics. Fourth are the issues of closure and communication within regimes. Fifth, and last, is the suggestion that by 1980 control oriented regimes will be supplemented by insurance regimes. Overall Robert O. Keohane seems to be a strong activist for the implementation of international regimes and over the course of the article seems to be trying to sway the reader’s opinion on the use of international regimes by expressing the vast strengths and benefits of them. These benefits and strengths will be presented point by point in this paper. First point is the identification of strength and weaknesses of constraint-choice analysis. Constraint-choice analysis is the understanding that in world politics there exists no hierarchy. The stage that is world politics is in constant, yet controlled, anarchy. Constraint-choice analyzes and understands that, although there is no higher power per se, there still is power and inequality. The larger states posses a greater power than smaller ones. This is why international regimes may become an important power to the larger states because they may push forward ideas and pass international legislation that benefits other large states. This is all great for the... Free Essays on emand for International Regimes Free Essays on emand for International Regimes God-Like Man In Robert O. Keohane’s article, â€Å"Demand for International Regimes†, there are many strong point expressed by the author. The main argument for the article is that international regimes allow for a more efficient flow of world politics by cutting cost of agreements, making more and higher quality knowledge available to the actors in world politics, and lastly making a solid framework for the legal responsibility of agreement making. In the paper five main points are expressed. First is the identification of the strengths and weaknesses of constraint-choice analysis. Second is the function of regimes and the contexts within they operate. Third are the benefits of international regimes and the demand by the actors in world politics. Fourth are the issues of closure and communication within regimes. Fifth, and last, is the suggestion that by 1980 control oriented regimes will be supplemented by insurance regimes. Overall Robert O. Keohane seems to be a strong activist for the implementation of international regimes and over the course of the article seems to be trying to sway the reader’s opinion on the use of international regimes by expressing the vast strengths and benefits of them. These benefits and strengths will be presented point by point in this paper. First point is the identification of strength and weaknesses of constraint-choice analysis. Constraint-choice analysis is the understanding that in world politics there exists no hierarchy. The stage that is world politics is in constant, yet controlled, anarchy. Constraint-choice analyzes and understands that, although there is no higher power per se, there still is power and inequality. The larger states posses a greater power than smaller ones. This is why international regimes may become an important power to the larger states because they may push forward ideas and pass international legislation that benefits other large states. This is all great for the...

Critically examine why financial liberalisation brought financial Essay

Critically examine why financial liberalisation brought financial crisis in most of the Asian countries (for example South Korea, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thaila - Essay Example Transactions in financial markets are affected by the efficiency of intermediaries such as brokers who put buyers and sellers together and professionals who keep the market in operation, ranging from clerks who keep records and financial analysts who allow information to flow within, to, and from the market (Howell et al., 2002). Historically, financial markets evolved under the close supervision, regulation, and protection of governments for the good of market agents (the suppliers and users of funds). Through laws, suppliers of funds such as depositors or lenders were protected from swindlers who ran away with the money, whilst users or funds borrowers had to be protected from usurious lenders. Whilst the government also made it difficult for a small number of market agents to establish an oligopoly, it also saw the need to create monopolies mainly for legitimate reasons such as the regulation of prices, public protection, and to stimulate market competition. However, when governments become too complacent, these legitimate reasons become intertwined with political factors and became illegitimate and burdensome, and instead of improving market efficiency it had the opposite effect: markets became too costly, prices were too high, artificial, and not competitive, and therefore highly inefficient. Inefficiency is tantamount to a lack of freedom in the operations of markets, so the call for market liberalisation is in effect a strategy to "free" the market from government regulations. Liberalisation is the removal of government interference in economic markets and barriers to trade (Stiglitz 2002: 59) and is supposed to improve a nation's economy by forcing resources to move from less to more productive uses, thereby raising efficiency in the use of resources. Liberalisation is not necessarily a bad thing because in fact and intention, it is for the benefit of market agents. However, like most other realities of life, if it is not done well it can end in disaster. Just to give some examples easy to understand: you don't ask a young man who just received his driver's license to race against David Coulthard or expect the Manchester school district's soccer champions to play well against Manchester United. Yet, this is what liberalisation attempts to do: the best way to improve the efficiency of financial markets is to let it free, which usually means allowing competitors both local and foreign to slug it out in open competition. The good ones will adjust, learn, and survive, whilst the poor ones will disappear. The financial markets of Southeast Asia before the crisis shared the characteristics of a market that was not free and of being under the influence of government regulations that stifled competition. The foreign exchange market was protected by a government that intervened in transactions to keep the local currencies artificially high. Bank interest rates were kept artificially low to favour local borrowers, which included local governments and favoured conglomerates. Awash with cheap funds, wanton borrowing and wild lending happened side by side to construct golf courses and buildings and purchase Porsches. How Inefficiency breeds Crisis The Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998 has been one of the well-studied